Best Practices¶
Guidelines for getting accurate, reliable results from Gradient Dynamics Studio.
Geometry Preparation¶
Start with a Clean Geometry¶
Always run geometry analysis before meshing — catch problems early
Use STEP format for CAD files — it preserves topology that helps meshing and surface identification
Simplify complex assemblies — remove small features (screws, bolts, labels) that don’t affect flow
Close gaps and holes — the geometry must be watertight for volume meshing
Remove internal surfaces — overlapping or duplicate faces can cause meshing errors
Geometry Scale¶
Verify your geometry is in the correct units (meters)
A car should be ~4.5 m long, not 4500 (millimeters) or 0.0045 (micrometers)
Incorrect scale leads to wrong mesh sizes, Reynolds numbers, and results
Meshing¶
Start Coarse, Then Refine¶
Coarse mesh first — Run a quick mesh to verify the setup
Check quality — Review flagged quality metrics and problem regions
Refine — Increase local or surface resolution and regenerate
Compare — Check that key quantities (Cd, pressure drop) change by < 5% between meshes
This “mesh independence study” ensures your results are not artifacts of the mesh resolution.
Near-Wall Resolution¶
Use the y+ calculator to determine the appropriate near-wall resolution for your flow speed and turbulence model
y+ ≈ 30 (wall-function RANS, medium surface refinement) works well for most external aerodynamics
y+ ≈ 1 (wall-resolved, fine or very fine surface refinement) is needed for LES, detailed heat transfer, or sensitive separation
Do not over-refine walls unnecessarily; near-wall resolution can add cells quickly
Refinement Zones¶
Focus refinement where it matters — wakes, separation zones, stagnation regions
Don’t over-refine far-field regions — cells far from the geometry contribute little to accuracy
Avoid extreme level jumps — 2-3 refinement levels between adjacent regions is a practical limit
Cover the full wake — for bluff bodies, the wake zone should extend at least 3× body length downstream
Domain Sizing¶
Too small is worse than too large — boundary effects contaminate the solution
External flow: Minimum 1.5× upstream, 3× downstream, 1.5× sides
Internal flow: Ensure adequate inlet development length (10× hydraulic diameter)
When in doubt, go larger — the extra cells are cheap compared to a wrong solution
Simulation¶
Solver Family¶
Use Automatic solver selection for first runs. Choose a specific solver family only when your physics, validation target, or workflow requires it.
Turbulence Model Selection¶
Situation |
Recommended Model |
|---|---|
First analysis / general purpose |
k-ω SST |
Industrial pipe/duct flow |
k-ε |
Quick preliminary study |
Spalart-Allmaras |
Strong swirl or rotation |
RSM |
Unsteady/acoustic analysis |
LES |
Convergence¶
Monitor residuals — residuals should decrease and then stabilize at an acceptable level
Check integrated quantities — Cd, Cl, pressure drop should plateau before you declare convergence
Residuals alone are not sufficient — a simulation can have low residuals but wrong results if the setup is incorrect
Run enough iterations — 500 minimum for RANS, 1000+ for complex geometries
Use conservative startup settings for difficult initial conditions
Common Pitfalls¶
Pitfall |
Consequence |
Prevention |
|---|---|---|
Forgetting moving ground for vehicle aero |
Unrealistic ground boundary layer |
Set ground as moving wall at freestream speed |
Wrong turbulence intensity at inlet |
Incorrect turbulence levels in domain |
Use 1% for external, 5% for internal |
Startup controls too aggressive |
Immediate divergence |
Start conservatively and ramp settings after the flow stabilizes |
Coarse mesh near features of interest |
Inaccurate local flow |
Add refinement zones at the right resolution |
Ignoring mesh quality warnings |
Poor convergence or wrong results |
Inspect flagged regions before simulating |
Solver family mismatched to physics |
Slow or unstable convergence |
Use Automatic first, then select a specific family only when needed |
Post-Processing¶
Validate Your Results¶
Compare with known data — use published Cd values, analytical solutions, or experimental data where available
Check mass conservation — inlet and outlet mass flow rates should match within 0.1%
Look for non-physical artifacts — negative pressures in unexpected places, symmetric flow that should be asymmetric, etc.
Verify force coefficients — are they in the expected range for your geometry type?
Effective Visualization¶
Start with surface coloring — pressure on the body shows the overall flow structure
Use slice planes — mid-span/centerline cuts reveal internal flow patterns
Add streamlines sparingly — too many streamlines create visual clutter
Set color ranges manually — auto-scaling can hide important features
Workflow Efficiency¶
Use the AI Assistant¶
The AI Assistant saves time by:
Automating geometry analysis and repair recommendations
Suggesting appropriate mesh settings and refinement levels for your application
Auto-detecting boundary conditions from surface names
Interpreting quality reports and results
Save Time with Symmetry¶
If your geometry and flow are symmetric:
Use a symmetry plane to mesh only half the domain
This halves cell count and compute cost
Results are mirrored automatically in visualization
Iterate Systematically¶
For design optimization:
Establish a baseline configuration
Change one parameter at a time
Use the same mesh settings for fair comparison
Record all results in a structured format